![]() But i guess Barnaul just would have needed longer barrel or silencer for all powder to burn inside barrel instead of open air, it has heavier bullet (11gr) with seemingly same muzzlespeeds as with Lapua and Sako (850-900m/s). I use mostly Lapua and Sako which burns very cleanly and there is no smoke or flash. Could be flash too, i havent' much paid attention to it and it often isn't as clear to shooter as smoke. I've had Russian Barnaul for my modernized Mosin-Nagant which had tons of smoke. Flash is alot about rifle's parameters, which is often issue with carbines and such as they have considerable shorter barrel compared to rifles to which ammo was originally introduced, so fumes for ignition don't all burn up in barrel. Which was problem from US point of view (not sure about soviets) as their powder wasn't nearly as smokeless. ![]() ![]() Germans had practically smokeless powder already back in ww2. I think US currently is introducing ammo which is pretty much smokeless, but they have lagged behind with that for decades. There isnt any smoke visible, but there is a buttload of flash.ĭepends. Which is me, firing a vz.58 with military surplus ammo. It is my general experience that military grade ammo is moderately smokey, certainly more than we're seeing atm.Īs for muzzle flash, let me repost this old gem: Protip: "military" grade ammo sits somewhere between "cheap shit" and " really cheap shit"
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |